![]() Second, the order in which the brothers are mentioned changes throughout the story, implying that order is a flexible entity and inviting both Cain and the audience to influence the sequence. First, the very name of Abel-“nothingness,” “vanity”-suggests that Abel will die soon. This action seems justified in various ways. They allow Cain to kill the beloved youngest and take his place. The gaps create an opening in the story to reverse the set order. Starting from what is said and more particularly how it is said, this article will show that the ambiguity in Genesis 4 does not consist of mere omissions that would have been easily filled in by contemporary readers/listeners but would be difficult to understand for later audiences. This article will revisit the gaps in the story in an approach that concurs with Meir Sternberg's vision of biblical ambiguity as the utmost realization of a literary universal. ![]() Over time numerous answers have been formulated, each one seemingly more plausible than the next. Many scholars have pointed to the gaps in the story of Cain and Abel in Genesis 4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |